Pan Rzymie Jerry pisze:dzień dobryCzy w każdym rodzaju polbremy finansowe? Wasza pomoc jest teraz. Czy utrata snu w nocy, martwiąc się, jak uzyskać kredyt? Nie dopuścić do swoich marzeń umrzeć, Kontakt z jego adres e-mail: (romeoloancompany1@gmail.com) dla kredytu proste i niezawodne. z następujących informacji:INFORMACJE Kredytobiorcf3wNazwy Kwota potrzebna ..Czas trwania : Twf3j kraj .Państwo : ..Miasta Telefony Liczba : ..Numer telefonu ..Miesięczny dochf3d ..Zawf3d Cel kredytu Płeć : ..Twf3j wiek ..Adres domowy : .Adres biura : ..Kontakt E-mail: Pan Rzymie Jerry odpowiedz
ja pisze:ja mam nadzieje ze bede takie same. Bron Boze tcrohe bardziej skomplikowane. Ucze sie 2 tyg i juz zrozumialam wiekszosc zadan ktorych nie umialam zrobic, Uczcie sie codziennie, bedzie dobrze ! Polecam wszystkim matematyka.pisz.pl Gdyby nie ten portal, z matury mialabym 0%, wiele osob zdalo z dobrym wynikiem rowniez dzieki tej str. Ja niestetty za pozno sie obudzilam odpowiedz
gondwannabe (13:04:36) :Warming, cooling, anopithogenrc, natural? Here’s a thought ending carbon addiction would allow us to move toward a world that isn’t bathing in foul hydrocarbons pollution is a real and measurable threat to planetary health. Um, no. Bacteria happily eat hydrocarbons. One must add agents to Diesel to prevent things growing in it. It is food to many organisms. It is also a natural part of the environment. There have been colonies of specialized organisms found living on the oil and natural gas from long term seeps. It takes a long time to evolve into a niche so this has been going on for a long time While we don't like bathing in oil, many other natural organisms do. Your assertion of foul is seriously self centered.Oh yes, secondary benefits we can say ‘adios’ to those oiligarchies;Something I'd very much like to do, and that we could do immediately, if we were free to use our coal for coal to liquids. The AGW thesis makes us more dependent on oil, not less, since oil has more H per C than coal does, so it becomes forbidden to use coal to replace oil gain the ‘first mover’ benefit by building an alternate energy driven economy; re-deploy our rustbelt industries to mass produce the simple solar technologies that can’t compete with cheap oil and dirt cheap coal.And just what is that first mover' benefit? Please note that the first company to exploit a new technology almost universally dies. It is replaced by a later entrant who can do it better given what is learned by the failures of the early adopters. That is the major risk in stock trading in development stage or early production companies. They typically pop, then drop hard to zero as a later entrant eats their lunch Buy the IPO, then sell as soon as the stock fails to advance' to the upside. How, exactly, do you use an old steel mill to make silicon ingots? How do you use a car assembly plant to make thin film flexible solar cells? Hmmm? The re-deploy' canard is a dead duck. You can't. At best, you can bulldoze the site and rebuild from the ground up, but it would be much cheaper to do a green field' development in China with cheaper labor, lower taxes, and less regulation. (That's why many of the hot solar stocks have Chinese addresses and those that don't often have an overseas assembly area with only the R&D in the U.S.)I do agree with your conclusion that these technologies can not compete with dirt cheap oil and coal. Absolutely correct. IMHO, the only reason to make them artificially more competitive is to offset the monopoly power of OPEC. THAT means an import tax on OPEC oil (not on NAFTA origin oil and not on fuel at the pump' that hits all sources including alternatives) and a specific exemption of such taxes on fuels from coal, biomass and natural gas (that we in the US have in abundance). The AGW agenda wants to kill coal use and gas to liquids. That is a serious mistake. Why? Because you can't put electrons into our existing vehicle fleet. It takes over a decade and up to 2 decades to do a fleet turnover to a new fuel if we were already doing it, which we are not. The decision not to use coal to liquids and gas to liquids in favor of {solar, wind, hydrogen, whatever funny fuel} is by definition a decision to stay substantially dependent on oil for at least a decade and probably two for transportation. Think about it. Please.You may all be right, but where is your vision for the future? My vision: Put an import tariff on OPEC oil (or all oil outside NAFTA, CAFTA type agreements) such that OPEC oil retail price can not drop below $80/bbl. (Tariff = Greater of( 0, $80 market price of oil) i.e. no negative tariff This provide protection of ALL the alternatives from OPEC market manipulation by putting a floor on oil of $80/bbl but not taxing the alternatives.The government does nothing else and leaves a level playing field for all the alternatives to compete in the market. Markets are far better at picking winning technologies than governments What I expect would happen: GTL, CTL, biomass/trash to liquids plants would sprout all over the place to provide non-OPEC fuel to the exiting fleet for the next decade+ while NAFTA source oil (i.e. Canada / Mexico) would go up in price a bit with sales diverted from non-U.S. buyers to the U.S. ) OVER TIME folks would choose to replace their present vehicles with hybrids, all electrics, hydrogen, dedicated CNG cars, whatever comes along as the domestic prices for the competitors jockey for position. After 15 to 20 years most of the fleet would IMHO, be a mix of flex-fuel hybrids and electrics with some high efficiency Diesels running on synthetic fuels. All with minimal economic disruption and without government screwing things up with mandates. See Brazil and South Africa as existence proofs of the ability to run modern economies while telling OPEC to go pound sand. odpowiedz
Alexa pisze:Mf3j chłopak zdawał w tym roku maturę, wszystkie pootwawdse przedmioty zdał, jako dodatkowy przedmiot wybrał chemię na rozszerzeniu i niestety oblał Wie ktoś może do kiedy trzeba wypełnić wniosek dotyczący chęci poprawienia tego przedmiotu w sierpniu? odpowiedz
Komentarze (25)